contribution of 25% and a loan of $7.5
million.
Today, that building is worth $5.8 million.
The
owner has lost all of his initial down payment
of
$2.5 million and is upside down on the
financing to
the tune of an additional $1.7 million. In
other
words, the entire $4.2 million dollar loss in
value is
in the owner ’s column.
In order to refinance this debt, the owner
will need
to reduce the principal loan amount to a point
that
will meet the lender’s underwriting
requirements. If
that point is 70% LTV, this means, the most
that the
bank will lend on the property now is $4.0
million
and the owner will need to come up with an
additional $3.5 million to pay off the
difference
between the original loan balance and the new
loan amount.
If the owner walks away from the property, he
has
lost $2.5 million. If he wants to keep the
property,
he needs to inject another $3.5 million for a
total
investment of $6.0 million on a property that
is now
worth only $5.8 million and is encumbered by a
debt obligation of $4.6 million. Now, when you
consider that many commercial properties are
held
by a single purpose entity such as an LLC, you
can
see that there is little incentive to the
property
owners to inject additional capital into a
struggling
property. In light of the depressed market
values,
refinancing is not likely to play a major role
in
addressing these distressed properties.